<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kurt Grandis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kurtgrandis.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kurtgrandis.com/blog</link>
	<description>Software Engineering &#38; Entrepreneurship</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on DGXPO 2008: Game Developers&#8217; Conference in the Triangle by Robert Rice</title>
		<link>http://kurtgrandis.com/blog/2008/04/02/dgxpo-2008-game-developers-conference-in-the-triangle/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 21:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kurtgrandis.com/blog/2008/04/02/dgxpo-2008-game-developers-conference-in-the-triangle/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hey Kurt! Make sure you say hi.

See you at the expo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kurt! Make sure you say hi.</p>
<p>See you at the expo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FogBugz: One Hot Ride by Corey Trager</title>
		<link>http://kurtgrandis.com/blog/2008/03/19/fogbugz-one-hot-ride/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Trager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kurtgrandis.com/blog/2008/03/19/fogbugz-one-hot-ride/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>If you like the approach of FogBugz, here comes a shameless  plug the free and open source variant, BugTracker.NET, which was heavily inspired by FogBugz.  More info at http://ifdefined.com/bugtrackernet.html.

It's style of presenting all the posts to a bug as a chronological narrative is similar, was well as the email integration, Subversion integration, and the utility for posting screenshots easily.

Main differences would be that it is less polished but more configurable than FogBugz, doesn't have a Wiki, and no time tracking (yet, but probably later this year) and no scheduling tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you like the approach of FogBugz, here comes a shameless  plug the free and open source variant, BugTracker.NET, which was heavily inspired by FogBugz.  More info at <a href="http://ifdefined.com/bugtrackernet.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/ifdefined.com');">http://ifdefined.com/bugtrackernet.html</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s style of presenting all the posts to a bug as a chronological narrative is similar, was well as the email integration, Subversion integration, and the utility for posting screenshots easily.</p>
<p>Main differences would be that it is less polished but more configurable than FogBugz, doesn&#8217;t have a Wiki, and no time tracking (yet, but probably later this year) and no scheduling tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another Amazon EC2 Beowulf Cluster Joins The Grid by Pete Skomoroch</title>
		<link>http://kurtgrandis.com/blog/2008/03/21/another-amazon-ec2-beowulf-cluster-joins-the-grid/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Skomoroch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 06:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kurtgrandis.com/blog/2008/03/21/another-amazon-ec2-beowulf-cluster-joins-the-grid/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Kurt,

Glad you were able to get a cluster running, thanks for writing up your experience.  The new 64 bit images have code for few performance benchmarks built in, including HPL.  I ran a few latency tests along with the NAS suite, but haven't run HPL on EC2 yet.  The source should be in /home/beowulf/hpl if you want to try it out...

Here are some sample NAS and latency numbers for a two node (16 core) cluster:

http://www.datawrangling.com/media/BPS-AmazonEC2-xlarge-run-1/index.html



-Pete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurt,</p>
<p>Glad you were able to get a cluster running, thanks for writing up your experience.  The new 64 bit images have code for few performance benchmarks built in, including HPL.  I ran a few latency tests along with the NAS suite, but haven&#8217;t run HPL on EC2 yet.  The source should be in /home/beowulf/hpl if you want to try it out&#8230;</p>
<p>Here are some sample NAS and latency numbers for a two node (16 core) cluster:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.datawrangling.com/media/BPS-AmazonEC2-xlarge-run-1/index.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.datawrangling.com');">http://www.datawrangling.com/media/BPS-AmazonEC2-xlarge-run-1/index.html</a></p>
<p>-Pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
